Friday, 28 June 2013

Obama jabs Russia and China

By Jeff Mason and Mark Felsenthal

DAKAR (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama said on Thursday he would not start "wheeling and dealing" with China and Russia over a U.S. request to extradite former American spy agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Obama, who appeared concerned that the case would overshadow his three-country tour of Africa begun in Senegal, also dismissed suggestions that the United States might try to intercept Snowden if he were allowed to leave Moscow by air.

"No, I'm not going to be scrambling jets to get a 29-year-old hacker," he told a news conference in Dakar, a note of disdain in his voice. Snowden turned 30 last week.

Obama said regular legal channels should suffice to handle the U.S. request that Snowden, who left Hong Kong for Moscow, be returned to the United States.

He said he had not yet spoken to China's President Xi Jinping or Russian President Vladimir Putin about the issue.

"I have not called President Xi personally or President Putin personally and the reason is ... number one, I shouldn't have to," Obama said sharply.

"Number two, we've got a whole lot of business that we do with China and Russia, and I'm not going to have one case of a suspect who we're trying to extradite suddenly being elevated to the point where I've got to start doing wheeling and dealing and trading on a whole host of other issues."

Snowden fled the United States to Hong Kong in May, a few weeks before publication in the Guardian and the Washington Post of details he provided about secret U.S. government surveillance of Internet and phone traffic.

The American, who faces espionage charges in the United States and has requested political asylum in Ecuador, has not been seen since his arrival in Moscow on Sunday. Russian officials said he was in a transit area at Sheremetyevo airport.

A Russian immigration source close to the matter said Snowden had not sought a Russian visa and there was no order from the Russian Foreign Ministry or Putin to grant him one.

CHARGES OF U.S. HYPOCRISY

Snowden's case has raised tensions between the United States and both China and Russia. On Thursday, Beijing accused Washington of hypocrisy over cyber security.

Obama's remarks in Senegal seemed calibrated to exert pressure without leading to lasting damage in ties with either country.

"The more the administration can play it down, the more latitude they'll have in the diplomatic arena to work out a deal for him (Snowden)," said Andy Smith, director of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center.

Obama indicated that damage to U.S. interests was largely limited to revelations from Snowden's initial leak.

"I continue to be concerned about the other documents that he may have," Obama said. "That's part of the reason why we'd like to have Mr. Snowden in custody."

Still, Snowden's disclosures of widespread eavesdropping by the U.S. National Security Agency in China and Hong Kong have given Beijing considerable ammunition in an area that has been a major irritant between the countries.

China's defense ministry called the U.S. government surveillance program, known as Prism, "hypocritical behavior."

"This 'double standard' approach is not conducive to peace and security in cyber space," the state news agency Xinhua reported, quoting ministry spokesman Yang Yujun.

In Washington, the top U.S. military officer dismissed comparisons of Chinese and American snooping in cyber space.

"All nations on the face of the planet always conduct intelligence operations in all domains," Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told an audience at the Brookings Institution.

"China's particular niche in cyber has been theft and intellectual property." Dempsey said. "Their view is that there are no rules of the road in cyber, there's nothing, there's no laws they are breaking, there's no standards of behavior."

In Ecuador, the leftist government of President Rafael Correa said it was waiving preferential rights under a U.S. trade agreement to demonstrate what it saw as its principled stand on Snowden's asylum request.

Correa told reporters Snowden's situation was "complicated" because he has not been able to reach Ecuadorean territory to begin processing the asylum request.

"In order to do so, he must have permission of another country, which has not yet happened," Correa said.

In a deliberately provocative touch, Correa's government also offered a multimillion dollar donation for human rights training in the United States.

The U.S. State Department warned of "grave difficulties" for U.S.-Ecuador relations if the Andean country were to grant Snowden asylum, but gave no specifics.

"USEFUL" CONVERSATIONS

Obama said the United States expected all countries that were considering asylum requests for the former contractor to follow international law.

The White House said last week that Hong Kong's decision to let Snowden leave would hurt U.S.-China relations. Its rhetoric on Russia has been somewhat less harsh.

Putin has rejected U.S. calls to expel Snowden to the United States and said the American should choose his destination and leave the Moscow airport as soon as possible.

Obama acknowledged that the United States did not have an extradition treaty with Russia, but said such a treaty was not necessary to resolve all of the issues involved.

He characterized conversations between Washington and Moscow as "useful."

Washington is focused on how Snowden, a former systems administrator for the contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, gained access to National Security Agency secrets while working at a facility in Hawaii.

NSA Director Keith Alexander on Thursday offered a more detailed breakdown of 54 schemes by militants that he said were disrupted by phone and internet surveillance, even as the Guardian newspaper reported evidence of more extensive spying.

In a speech in Baltimore, Alexander said a list of cases turned over recently to the U.S. Congress included 42 that involved disrupted plots and 12 in which surveillance targets provided material support to terrorism.

The Guardian reported that the NSA for years collected masses of raw data on the email and Internet traffic of U.S. citizens and residents, citing a top-secret draft report on the program prepared by NSA's inspector general.

(Additional reporting by Brian Ellsworth and Alexandra Valencia in Quito, Lidia Kelly and Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Sui-Lee Wee in Beijing, Deborah Charles in Baltimore and Steve Holland, Laura MacInnis and Mark Hosenball in Washington; Writing by Jeff Mason and Christopher Wilson; Editing by Mike Collett-White and Tim Dobbyn)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-jabs-russia-china-failure-extradite-snowden-073536769.html

Melissa King

Thursday, 27 June 2013

Lebanese troops secure hardline cleric's complex

BEIRUT (AP) ? Lebanese troops detonated booby traps at a complex captured from followers of a hardline Sunni cleric on Tuesday, securing the area after two days of fighting that left dozens dead in the port city of Sidon.

Soldiers who blocked off several office and residential buildings around the mosque where Ahmad al-Assir once preached told reporters they were clearing the complex of explosives. An Associated Press photographer on the scene heard several explosions and saw black smoke billowing during the operation.

The fate of Al-Assir, a maverick Sunni sheik who controlled the complex for about two years, is unknown. His rapid rise in popularity underscored the deep frustration among many Lebanese who resent the influence Shiites have gained in government via the militant group Hezbollah.

Official reports said at least 17 soldiers were killed and 50 were wounded in the fighting while more than 20 of al-Assir's supporters died in the battle, according to a security official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to talk to reporters.

The streets around al-Assir's complex were packed with people who came to inspect their homes and shops, many of which were damaged during the fighting. Lebanese commandos patrolled streets littered with burnt-out cars and others riddled with bullets.

The state-run National News Agency reported Tuesday that military prosecutor Saqr Saqr has asked military intelligence to open an investigation into the Sidon clashes and begin interrogating some 40 detainees. On Monday, Saqr issued arrest warrants for al-Assir and 123 of his supporters.

Sidon, located about 40 kilometers (25 miles) south of Beirut, had largely been spared from violence plaguing Lebanon's border areas where Syria's civil war has been spilling over. Fighting in the Mediterranean city began Sunday after troops arrested an al-Assir follower. The army says the cleric's supporters opened fire without provocation on an army checkpoint.

Also Tuesday, a roadside bomb exploded on the key highway linking Beirut to the Syrian capital without causing casualties, security officials said. They said the small bomb went off early in the morning near the town of Barr Elias, a few kilometers (miles) from the border crossing point of Masnaa.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity in line with regulations. It was the second such attack on the highway within weeks.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/lebanese-troops-secure-hardline-clerics-complex-111029152.html

NFL Network

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

Watch Obama's Climate Change Speech ? Turns Out He's Talking Keystone

President Obama's much anticipated speech on climate change is underway at Georgetown University. Watch it below, and read our preview/overview if you haven't. Even before it begins, though, a bit of new news: among his proposals, the president will reportedly set a critical emissions measure for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline.

RELATED: How Obama Could Nix the Keystone Pipeline (and Why He Won't)

That news comes from Sam Stein at the Huffington Post, by way of an unnamed administration official.

"As the executive order on Keystone contemplates, the environmental impacts will be important criteria used in the determination of whether the Keystone pipeline application will ultimately be approved at the completion of the State Department decision process," said the senior administration official. "In today?s speech, the president will make clear that the State Department should approve the pipeline only if it will not lead to a net increase in overall greenhouse gas emissions."

For opponents of the pipeline, this will be surprising ? and very welcome ??news. For months, skeptics suggested that the president was likely to approve the pipeline; some saw today's announced crackdown on carbon dioxide as a potential point of leverage with environmental groups for the political space to approve the pipeline. But moreover, multiple recent studies, including one described by Scientific American in April have shown that the Keystone pipeline would indeed yield a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The pipeline will funnel a product called dilbit, diluted bitumen, from tar sands in Alberta to the Gulf Coast. The sludgy fossil fuel product uses more energy for extraction and processing than more conventional fuels, which could result in 181 million metric tons of greenhouse gas annually.

RELATED: Gore: Obama Has 'Failed to Stand Up' on Global Warming

A draft environmental analysis released by the State Department in March downplayed that volume of emissions, primarily by assuming that the tar sands would be developed regardless of the existence of the Keystone XL pipeline ??which is itself a debatable assumption. Regardless, the president could make a rhetorical point on Keystone today and then point to the draft State analysis as justification for approving the pipeline.

RELATED: The White House Convenes Scientists to Discuss the World's New Ocean

We shall see. Watch the president's speech below.

RELATED: Critics of Keystone Pipeline Deal Surround The White House

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/watch-obamas-climate-change-speech-turns-hes-talking-174716170.html

Steve Alford

Tuesday, 18 June 2013

Miss Utah vs. Barack Obama and Jay Carney (Powerlineblog)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/313431958?client_source=feed&format=rss

dick cheney heart umf elite eight stephon marbury the lion king suzanne collins cherry blossom festival

10 Things to Know for Tuesday

Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Tuesday:

1. SUPREME COURT THROWS UP AN OBSTACLE

Monday's ruling will make it harder for states seeking to bar people who are in the U.S. illegally from voting.

2. PUTIN SAYS HE WON'T BUDGE

At the G-8 summit, Russia's leader rejects calls from the West to halt his support of Syria's Assad.

3. TAKING STOCK OF IRAN'S NEW LEADER

Hasan Rowhani may be hailed as a force for change, but he also appears to know he'll be able to push his views only so far.

4. PENTAGON OUTLINES PLAN TO EXPAND WOMEN'S COMBAT ROLES

Female service members could be able to start training as Army paratroopers and Navy commandos in the next few years.

5. SYRIA'S KURDS FURTHER COMPLICATE CIVIL WAR

By pursuing a path of autonomy, the nation's Kurdish minority could add another layer of ethnic tensions to the fighting.

6. WHY KRAFT'S PACKAGED TURKEY SLICES LOOK LIKE LEFTOVERS

It's an example of food companies trying their best to make processed foods appear homemade.

7. HIGH DRAMA ON FLIGHT FROM HONG KONG

Passengers and a flight attendant jump on a screaming man and bind him hand and foot for the last six hours of a flight to the U.S.

8. WHO'S MAKING MARIJUANA ACTIVISTS UNEASY

An ex-Microsoft manager wants to build a nationwide pot empire ? a venture that could draw unwanted attention from the federal government.

9. STREISAND ADDRESSES ONE OF ISRAEL'S TOUCHIEST TOPICS

Visiting Jerusalem, the entertainer criticizes Jewish religious practices that separate men and women.

10. WHICH COUPLE NOW MOVES TO CENTER STAGE

With Kim Kardashian having given birth, the next highly anticipated celebrity baby is Prince William and Kate Middleton's. She's expecting in mid-July.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/10-things-know-tuesday-103642113.html

metta world peace ron artest gladys knight private practice

Friday, 14 June 2013

eBook Launch: How To Name A Business - sales page review ...

James Rayers's Avatar

Forum regular

?

Join Date: Sep 2012

Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 121

Thanks: 1

Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts


Hi Leah,

Congratulations on completing the book.

Very exciting that you are diversifying your business and adding product eBooks to your revenue. This is something I have wanted to do for a while so I will be keen to hear how the launch goes.

Have you had any experience with Product Launch Formula? If you can get hold of any of the material it will definitely give you some great ideas to plan your launch. I've never even purchased the program, just the free material was enough to help me brainstorm my own system.

As for the sales page you have there, it is certainly a great start.

  • If you can get a video that explains the eBook instead of having to read all the text, do that. I would rather watch a sales video than read 10 minutes worth of text. Product Launch Formula does it perfectly - http://www.productlaunchformula.com/.
  • The copy and formatting overall is impressive for a first attempt. Good use of bold and underlined text. In general it could probably be be a bit bigger, just to make it more readable.
  • You probably need to break it up into more manageable chunks. Increasing the size should help (just so you don't see so much text on the screen at one time), but adding some icons or pictures might help as well.
  • I almost missed the testimonials you have there. They are almost the most important part of your sales page so they need to be prominent, and clearly attributed to someone. If you can add a photo of the referees do so, and even better link to their LinkedIn or Twitter account - it just makes people feel like they are real.
  • The eBook cover you have is nice, but covered up by all the text and banners. Try and get it on a white background on its own so it looks like you could almost pick it up off the page. And also make sure you don't use the purple anywhere except your call to action button. You don't want to dilute its importance.
  • I would increase the size of everything in your Buy it Now area. This needs to the be the most prominent area on the page. Break it out from the styling of everything else. I also like the use of the term 'Instant Download' as it promotes the speediness of the process. (I think this sales page - http://www.popupdomination.com/live/ - does a lot of good things - although I think it feels a little crowded).
  • Drop your header links, email subscribe and blurb at the bottom about more help. You can get all this information through to people in the eBook sale - get their email address in the checkout, and offer them more help at the end of the eBook. This page has only one goal, to sell the book.
  • If you want to grab emails, you should leverage the free chapter that you are offering as an incentive to submit an email address. You could also do a bit more to market that section. Call it a 'Lite' version that is available for 'FREE'. They put their email address - you drip feed them the pages over 2 days, and then at the end you send them a buy now link to get the rest.

Hopefully that is helpful rather than hindering for you. Obviously getting that all in for the first incarnation of your sales page is going to be tough, but it should at least give you some ideas. __________________
Did this comment help you?
I like helping people make the most of their website so give me a call at Sitecentre on ? (02) 8005 1365.

Source: http://www.flyingsolo.com.au/forums/community-reviews/25827-ebook-launch-how-name-business-sales-page-review.html

anchorman capybara duggars

Monday, 3 June 2013

Four Houston firefighters killed, one injured in historic fire

In the deadliest fire in the history of the Houston Fire Department, four firemen, three veterans and one rookie, were killed on Friday. A fifth fireman was hospitalized and is in critical condition.?

By Associated Press / June 1, 2013

Houston firefighters embrace near the scene of a fatal five-alarm fire at a motel on the Southwest Freeway Friday, in Houston. Four firefighters searching for people they thought might be trapped in a blazing Houston motel and restaurant Friday were killed when the part of the structure collapsed and ensnared them, authorities said.

Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle/AP

Enlarge

One?Houston?firefighter remained hospitalized in critical condition Saturday, a day after a massive motel and restaurant fire killed four of his fellow firefighters.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

A total of 14 were hospitalized Friday afternoon.?Houston?Fire Department spokesman Jay Evans said Saturday that other injured firefighters had been released overnight, but he did not have a precise count.

Among the four killed were veterans of the department and a newcomer just a month out of the fire training academy.

The fire broke out at a restaurant connected to the Southwest Inn along a busy freeway, and was the deadliest in the 118-year history of the department. Three firefighters died at the scene, while the fourth died at a hospital, according to the mayor's office and a medical examiner.

One of the dead is 29-year-old Robert Garner. His father, Jerry Veuleman, told the?Houston?Chronicle that Garner was proud of his work and had set his sights on becoming a firefighter after leaving the military. He joined the department in 2010.

"'Use your training. Don't be a hero. God will look after you,' " Veuleman recalled telling him. "God chose it was time to take Robert and the other firefighters. We are sorry, but we are also blessed."

The others who died were: 35-year-old Capt. Matthew Renaud, an 11-year veteran of the department; 41-year-old Robert Bebee, who joined almost 12 years ago; and 24-year-old rookie firefighter Anne Sullivan. She had graduated from the training academy in April.

Fire officials said they took a high risk in aggressively fighting the fire because they believed people were inside the motel. When a portion of the building collapsed, the firefighters were trapped.

In 1953 and 2000, two?Houston?firefighters were killed in a single fire. Three firefighters died in 1929 when a train slammed broadside into their engine.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/6PAlNdLl9z0/Four-Houston-firefighters-killed-one-injured-in-historic-fire

Jason London rick ross yahoo finance

Sunday, 2 June 2013

Royal Victoria Golf Club - VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum

History Buff's Avatar ?

Join Date: Oct 2011

Location: Victoria

Posts: 951


Quote:

You know, someone posted on my FB page today, commenting on how this course is truly sitting on millions of dollars worth of real estate.

And it got me thinking, who owns that thing? Is the property zoned only for golf course? Man, if someone sold it, they could get LOTS of money, if it could be sold for development.


Ya you could say that about any undeveloped lot not a big surprise there that its worth money.

Beacon Hill Park is worth money too and so is all of the ocean side of Dallas Road.

Source: http://www.vibrantvictoria.ca/forum/sports-outdoor-recreation-60/royal-victoria-golf-club-6396/

asteroid mining ivan rodriguez planetary resources mothers day gift ideas natalee holloway scotty mccreery megan fox pregnant

Spike in violence in Iraq has echoes in the past

BAGHDAD (AP) ? More than a year after the U.S. military left Iraq, the country is reeling from its most sustained violence since 2008. Over the last two months more than 1,700 people have been killed, raising fears the country is sliding back into chaos.

The current mayhem began with a wave of protests by Sunnis alleging neglect and mistreatment at the hands of the Shiite-led government of Nouri al-Maliki. Violence has risen steadily since an April 23 crackdown by security forces on a Sunni protest in the northern city of Hawija.

Conflict between Iraq's two main religious communities sounds ominously like the explosion of sectarian hatred unleashed by the U.S.-led invasion of 2003 that toppled Saddam Hussein's Sunni-led regime and propelled the Shiites to power.

Adding to the tension is the civil war in neighboring Syria, where Sunni rebels are seeking to topple Bashar Assad's government, dominated by a spinout of the Shiite faith and backed by Shiite powerhouse Iran.

But the Iraq of 2013 is different from the country seven years ago. The Shiite government is more firmly entrenched in Baghdad. The Sunnis are divided and weakened from setbacks they suffered in the last sectarian war.

Violence is on the rise but far short of the levels when death squads roamed the streets.

Clearly, many Iraqis are still worried.

"I see no solution on the horizon in a country that is full of political and sectarian disputes," said Ali Abdullah, who has blocked parking in front of his mobile phone store in Baghdad's sprawling Shiite district of Sadr City to protect against car bombs.

Mohammad Majeed, a Baghdad businessman in the mixed Sunni-Shiite neighborhood of Jihad, is considering fleeing the country.

"Terror is returning to us," Majeed said. "I survived the first round. I don't want to take my chances with a second one."

___

Two AP Chiefs of Bureau in Baghdad, past and present, paint a picture of what it was like then and how things have changed.

___

By ROBERT H. REID

It began with fierce fusillades ? rapid bursts of gunfire aimed wildly, designed to drive people from the streets as much as to kill. The killing would come soon enough.

In rapid succession, and with military precision, gunmen set up checkpoints along the major streets in west Baghdad's religiously mixed Jihad district, while black-clad Shiite youths strung barbed wire along side streets.

As a blistering sun sent temperatures soaring above 100 degrees, gunmen bearing lists of names roamed house-to-house, taking away fighting-aged men. Some were never seen again. Others were found lifeless in the streets.

At the checkpoints, motorists were hauled from their cars and shot dead if they were found with ID cards identifying them as Sunnis.

By sunset on July 9, 2006, at least 41 people, mostly Sunnis, were dead, according to police. The U.S. military insisted it could only account for 14 deaths. The next day, two bombs exploded in a Shiite neighborhood, killing 10 people in what appeared to be payback.

Whatever the numbers, the Jihad massacre was emblematic of the cold-blooded savagery of Iraq's sectarian conflict, which raged from early 2006 until 2008 and transformed the character of the eight-year Iraq war.

In the month of July 2006 alone, at least 2,708 Iraq civilians were slaughtered, according to a Pentagon count released in 2010. Some at the time estimates put the civilian death toll that month at nearly 3,270. By contrast the U.S. and its international coalition allies lost 43 troops.

As the war entered its third year, the conflict morphed from a straightforward fight between U.S.-led troops and the mostly Shiite Iraqi forces on one hand and Sunni insurgents and al-Qaida on the other into a wave of uncontrolled slaughter and terror in which civilians were the main target.

It became a Shiite-Sunni fight for power ? with members of the U.S.-backed government surreptitiously involved. Longtime neighbors became mortal enemies based on their religious affiliation alone.

Ground zero was Baghdad and a handful of other religiously and ethnically mixed cities. In those battlegrounds, fear paralyzed daily life, even as people attempted to work or shop or attend school beneath the shadow of sudden and violent death. Streets of once-thriving neighborhoods turned into ghost towns, either largely abandoned or with residents cowering at home in fear.

Panic swept through families when loved ones were late returning from work. Hearts pounded when motorists were stuck in traffic. Did the driver in the next lane look like a would-be car bomber? Was the checkpoint manned by soldiers or militiamen from a rival sect?

Many Sunni families feared venturing to Baghdad's main morgue to claim bodies of loved ones because the area was controlled by Shiite gunmen. In February 2007, the Shiite deputy health minister was arrested for allegedly running death squads, using ambulances for kidnapping and funneling money to Shiite militias. Charges were dismissed a year later amid allegations of witness intimidation. Now that former official, Hakim al-Zamili, is a member of parliament.

Forgers did a thriving business selling forged ID cards bearing fake names identified with a particular sect ? Omar in case the gunmen were Sunnis, Ali or Hussein if the threat came from Shiites.

Armed men roamed the streets in a deadly cat-and-mouse game with overstretched American soldiers and Iraqi forces ? some of whom were in collusion with sectarian militias. American spokesmen argued vehemently against any suggestion that Iraq had descended into civil war.

Car bombs and roadside explosives still claimed victims. But much of the mayhem occurred at night and in silence.

Nighttime was when death squads ? many believed directed by the Shiite-led Ministry of Interior ? hunted for their victims. Their often mutilated bodies were left on the streets or vacant lots for all to see as dawn rose.

Other victims were dumped into the Tigris River. Their bodies would turn up southeast of the capital near Kut, trapped in underwater nets set up to collect vegetation that can clog the waterway.

How many died because of religion and how many fell victim to common criminals or personal vendettas? No one really knows. In the calculus of barbarity, the Americans came up with their own formula: anyone shot in the head was a victim of sectarianism. Bullets to the torso were deemed the work of common criminals.

___

By ADAM SCHRECK

Fast forward seven years to 2013.

The once-pervasive American troops and armored vehicles are gone. Baghdad neighborhoods are patrolled solely by the Iraqi police and army, which still draw heavily from the Shiite majority that controls the levers of power. At some of their posts, banners bearing the image of Shiite saint Imam Hussein wave proudly ? a not-so-subtle affirmation of the security forces' sectarian loyalties.

Traffic-clogging checkpoints still block streets lined with concrete blast walls, although many of the barriers have been removed. The car bombings and roadside explosives deployed primarily by Sunni extremists never really went away. It is only their frequency that goes up and down.

They're up sharply these days, with multiple blasts rocking Baghdad and other cities nearly every day.

Iraq again feels at an ominous turning point, even if the tallies of the dead are a fraction of what they were at the height of the bloodshed. A United Nations count said April was the deadliest month since June 2008, with 712 Iraqis killed in violent attacks. That total was surpassed in May, with the UN reporting 1,045 dead.

As recently as a few months ago, there was a feeling of optimism in many parts of Baghdad despite the threat of indiscriminate bloodshed. Parks filled with families out picnicking on holidays, car sales were booming and shiny new restaurants were opening.

But the relentless pounding of violence has brought a renewed sense of terror to the Iraqi capital. In an apparent attempt to thwart car bombings, authorities have imposed a sweeping ban on cars with relatively common temporary license plates, affecting large numbers of commuters.

Fewer people are venturing out on the streets, and businesses are pulling down the shutters earlier than usual.

The late-night televised press conference called by the Sunni finance minister, Rafia al-Issawi, to denounce a raid on his office by security forces back in December seemed at first like the latest in a series of moves that have sidelined prominent Sunnis in the Shiite-led government.

In hindsight, it was the trigger that reignited suppressed Sunni rage and would send masses of protesters into the streets of cities like Ramadi, Fallujah, Samarra and Mosul ? former insurgent strongholds that had been flashpoints in the U.S.-led battle to exert control over the country.

As the Sunni protest movement gathered steam, so did the sectarian tensions.

Some among the demonstrators in Sunni-dominated Anbar province waved al-Qaida flags ? symbols of Sunni supremacy ? and chanted that those with the distinctively Shiite name Abdul-Zahra would not be allowed into the province.

Back in Baghdad's Jihad neighborhood, overt threats not seen in years made a comeback. Leaflets left outside Sunni households warned recipients to leave or face "great agony." They were signed by the Mukhtar Army, a new Shiite militant group with ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

Early on the morning of April 23, Iraqi security forces faced off against an energized group of Sunni protesters, some wielding swords, in the northern town of Hawija. A gunbattle eventually broke out.

By the time it was all over, at least 20 among the protesters were dead along with three soldiers. The Sunni deputy prime minister leading an official government probe into the incident puts the number of protesters killed at more than 40. Human Rights Watch said photos it obtained suggested some demonstrators had their hands bound and had been killed execution-style.

The violent reaction was swift.

Gunmen tried to overrun towns and army posts near Hawija. Bombs exploded outside of Sunni mosques and worshippers leaving others were felled by gunfire.

Iraqi officials believe more militant groups are joining Sunni jihadists like al-Qaida in attacks against Shiites and symbols of government authority. The attacks on Sunni holy sites, meanwhile, have killed more than 100 people since Hawija, raising the possibility that Shiite militias are getting involved in tit-for-tat attacks.

___

Reid, currently Chief of Bureau for Germany, Austria and Switzerland, has covered Iraq since 2003 and can be followed at http://twitter.com/rhreid. Schreck has been Chief of Bureau in Baghdad since 2012 and can be followed at http://twitter.com/adamschreck.

___

Associated Press writers Qassim Abdul-Zahra and Sameer N. Yacoub contributed to this report.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/spike-violence-iraq-echoes-past-143149796.html

stevie nicks anchorman capybara duggars peter facinelli bobby rush supreme court justices

SmackDown Results: Following Orton?s standoff against Ambrose, an irate Bryan repelled The Shield

All WWE programming, talent names, images, likenesses, slogans, wrestling moves, trademarks, logos and copyrights are the exclusive property of WWE, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. ? 2013 WWE, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This website is based in the United States. By submitting personal information to this website you consent to your information being maintained in the U.S., subject to applicable U.S. laws. U.S. law may be different than the law of your home country. WrestleMania XXIX (NY/NJ) logo TM & ? 2013 WWE. All Rights Reserved. The Empire State Building design is a registered trademark and used with permission by ESBC.

Source: http://www.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/2013-05-31/results

free ecards flying car masters golf tournament the replacements how to hard boil eggs new nfl uniforms derbyshire

Twitter adds inline profile editing, drag-and-drop photo uploads

Twitter adds inline profile editing, draganddrop photo uploads

Twitter has made it just a tad easier to tweak your profile information by offering the option of changing them inline. The feature, which is available through both the website and its official mobile apps, enables faster changes to your account bio, as well as drag-and-drop upload capability for your header and profile photos. It's a small change, but ultimately it's meant to encourage users to keep their accounts fresh and relevant. Check out the video below the break to see exactly how it works.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Via: TheNextWeb

Source: Twitter

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/kNus3U_8YxA/

marysville tornados dr. seuss the temptations rush limbaugh sandra fluke green book some like it hot

Doctor?s Doubts Imperil Lucrative Diabetes Drugs

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Findings by Dr. Peter C. Butler on Merck?s medication Januvia are threatening the future of all drugs in its class, yearly sales of which exceed $9 billion.
    


Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/business/a-doctor-raises-questions-about-a-diabetes-drug.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

new hope baptist church associated press foster friess new orleans hornets ghost rider spirit of vengeance hornets prince johan friso

Saturday, 1 June 2013

This Week's Top Comedy Video: Jon Lajoie's Get Rich Kickstarter

Kickstarter campaigns can be awesome. Or sometimes be invigoratingly useful like Veronica Mars. Or be revealingly sad like Zach Braff's. Or what about ridiculously blatant like comedian Jon Lajoie. Lajoie, who stars on FX's The League, mocks all Kickstarter campaigns by asking people to donate to his cause by making him rich.

Read more...

    


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/QqjTzjOj-B8/this-weeks-top-comedy-video-jon-lajoies-get-rich-kic-510783935

space weather

Thursday Thinkpiece: Arthurs on Legal Education ? Slaw

Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. In every case the proper permissions have been obtained. If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site's contact form.

?Valour Rather Than Prudence?:?Hard Times And Hard Choices For Canada?s Legal Academy
Harry Arthurs
(2013) 76 (1) Saskatchewan Law Review

Excerpt: Part C, The Return of Legal Fundamentalism

[Footnotes converted to endnotes and renumbered.]

I have not completed my catalogue of the hard times confronting our law schools. Perhaps the most serious of all is the return of what might be called ?legal fundamentalism.?

For a century or more, legal scholars (and some thoughtful practitioners and judges) have one way or another insisted upon the indeterminacy of legal decisions, the historical contingency of legal institutions and processes, and the cultural variability of what people understand ?law? to be. There is, of course, no manifesto to which all Canadian law faculties or professors members subscribe. The only attempt to write one, in the early 1980s, provoked more controversy than concurrence.[1] Nonetheless, I maintain, in the 1960s the legal academy began tentatively to explore a series of what I will describe (for want of a better descriptor) as ?anti-fundamentalist? propositions. The legal academy embraced these propositions with some enthusiasm in the 1970s and 1980s, and by the 1990s it had begun to translate them into discursive conventions (what we teach and write and how) and institutional practices (how we organize collective activity and present ourselves to our various publics). Today, while anti-fundamentalism is far from universal, it finds at least tacit expression in the mission statements, curriculum reports and academic programs of most law faculties and in the CVs and course syllabi of many individual law professors. Its underlying assumptions, and their implications, can be captured in a series of syllogisms:

  • Substantive legal knowledge is inherently indeterminate, has a short shelf life, and is used (if at all) in unpredictable combinations by lawyers in various kinds of practices. The study of particular subjects should therefore be regarded not so much as an end in itself but rather as a vehicle for teaching law students how to analyze and resolve legal problems.
  • No convincing argument or evidence demonstrates that any particular area of substantive law is indispensable for either students? intellectual formation or lawyers? professional functions. Law schools should therefore construct their curricula so as to afford students an ample, arguably unlimited, choice of courses and seminars, whose content and pedagogic strategy should be largely at the instructors? discretion.
  • Many lawyers spend much of their time performing routine procedures that can be (and are) also performed by para-professionals and support staff with no formal knowledge of the underlying legal rules or principles. Law schools believe that, while students should be made aware of these routine procedures in a general sense, training in their use is best undertaken elsewhere.
  • Successful resolution of most problems encountered in legal practice requires not only knowledge of substantive and adjectival law but also an ability to negotiate the practicalities of the legal system, to engage with the real-life circumstances of the parties and to take account of the larger social and economic circumstances within which their interests are imbricated. Law students should therefore learn not only to locate problems within their legal-systemic and larger societal contexts, but also to work effectively with non-legal actors to resolve them.
  • Law graduates not only provide conventional legal services to clients, but also occupy leadership and technocratic roles in business, government, politics and social movements. Law teachers should therefore expose their students?many of whom will occupy these roles?to insights from adjacent disciplines so that they will better comprehend how law shapes and is shaped by social and economic forces and cultural practices.
  • Law and legal practice have become increasingly complex, and are changing at an increasing rate of speed. Law schools should therefore educate law students to adapt to complexity and change, and to embrace and promote change that is in the public interest. Legal scholars should assist the profession and the public by identifying the need for change, offering insights into the best way to achieve it, documenting its effects, and critically evaluating its consequences.
  • Academics, lawyers working on public policy issues, as well as many specialist practitioners require greater breadth, depth and variety of knowledge than is provided in basic JD courses. Law faculties should therefore offer enriched or advanced JD programs, graduate programs, and programs of continuing education.

To acknowledge once again the limits of this description, while most Canadian law faculties and individual professors subscribe to these anti-fundamentalist propositions, they do so with varying degrees of conviction, and actually act on their implications with varying degrees of consistency. Still, it would be difficult to find a single law faculty that opposes them on grounds of principle, or for that matter, many individual law teachers who do so.[2]

By contrast, legal fundamentalists tend to believe that ?law??as a field of study, as a profession, as a social institution?has an essential meaning, a core content, and distinctive institutional characteristics that may change slowly over time but at any given moment can be authoritatively specified. The criteria for specification and the source of the authority to specify are not, for fundamentalists, open to question: they are the constitutional and institutional arrangements found on every conventional map or model of law. Compelling evidence that constitutions change meaning and institutions change functions over time seems not to disturb their certainty; their own lived experience that statutes, regulations, judicial decisions, and practical professional knowledge all have a limited shelf-life seems not to alter their insistence on law?s immutability. Fundamentalists also believe that legal rules can and do shape human and corporate conduct. However, they decline to acknowledge that the rules themselves are often ambiguous, that they are interpreted and applied by themselves and other human agents, that those agents are susceptible to cultural, social, and economic influences, and that legal rules are often circumnavigated or disregarded when they run counter to the felt necessities of the time or the interests of powerful clients. Finally, fundamentalists are dismissive of the idea that law can be produced other than by formal institutions of the state, in accordance with constitutionally mandated procedures. But they remain oblivious to the undoubted power of non-state normative systems that operate within, beyond and often in opposition to state law?including normative systems they themselves construct as public officials, as architects of the structures of private governance, and as shapers of quotidian legal routines.

The report of the FLSC task force exemplifies this fundamentalist approach. All law graduates are expected to demonstrate: (a) three ?skills competencies? (in problem solving, legal research, and oral and written legal communication);[3] (b) ?an awareness and understanding? of legal ethics and professionalism (in a course dedicated to that subject);[4] and (c) a ?general understanding of the foundations of law?[5] (principles of common law and equity, statutory construction and analysis, and the administration of justice), ?of the core principles of public law?[6] (constitutional law, including the Charter and the rights of Aboriginal peoples; criminal law; and administrative law) and ?of the foundational legal principles that apply to private relationships? (contracts, torts, property, and ?legal and fiduciary concepts in commercial relationships?).[7]

I identify this approach as ?fundamentalist? because the Task Force treats its selection of these particular ?competencies? and ?understandings? as res judicata, requiring no further explanation than the fact that eminent and experienced lawyers have signed their names to the report. But its selection is clearly both over- and under-inclusive. For example, numeracy, inter-personal skills, and the capacity to organize information are ?competencies? almost all lawyers must deploy, but law students will not be obliged to acquire them. Another example: the ?foundations of law? mysteriously do not appear to include legal theory, legal history, or the sociology of law. And one more example: students? ?awareness? of ?ethics and professionalism? need not extend to the governance of the profession or to the economic and social forces that tempt or compel its members to transgress the rules of professional conduct. Worse yet, no theoretical or practical rationale is provided for designating certain substantive subjects as required and others as not. The Task Force does not claim that most lawyers actually use the designated fields of substantive knowledge in their practices; nor could it: almost no one practices in all of the fields mentioned, very few practice in some of them (such as criminal or constitutional law), and a great many who practice in specialized fields require knowledge of substantive subjects other than those specified (such as tax, employment, or intellectual property law). It does not assert that lawyers must understand the subjects identified because it will enable them to adapt to the changes in law that will inevitably occur during their careers. For example, no mention is made in the Task Force report of international, comparative, or transnational law, which are likely to become increasingly important given the globalization of Canada?s economy (nor, parenthetically, does the Task Force believe that ?a general understanding of the core legal concepts applicable to the practice of law in Canada?[8] should extend to the concepts of civil law). Nor does the Task Force justify its selection on the ground that certain fields of substantive instruction have been given priority on the basis of the public good or general welfare: for example, ?legal and fiduciary concepts in commercial relationships?[9] are required, but similar concepts in family, professional or governmental relationships are ignored.

In developing its list of requirements, then, the Task Force report acknowledges the relevance of neither theory nor empirical evidence. It therefore ignores the extent and rapidity of social, cultural, political, and economic change which shortens the shelf life of much substantive law and requires ongoing revision of the institutions and processes through which law works. It ignores technology that is changing access to legal information and the processing of legal transactions and, therefore, the course of legal routines, the cost structure of legal practices, the clientele that lawyers serve, and (for all of these reasons) the competencies and substantive knowledge they must possess in the future. It ignores the marked functional differentiation of roles within the legal profession that requires specialists to narrow but deepen their legal knowledge and general practitioners to broaden theirs while embedding it in standard forms and structured routines whose deployment does not entail costs that will price them out of the markets they serve.


[1] Consultative Group on Research and Education in Law, Law and Learning, (Ottawa: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, 1983). I was the principal author of this report.

[2] But there are some: their contributions range from sophisticated scholarship to vulgar rants. See, respectively, Ernest J Weinrib, ?Can Law Survive Legal Education?? (2007) 60 Vanderbilt LJ 401; and Robert Martin, ?University Legal Education is Corrupt Beyond Repair? (2009) 40:4 Interchange 437.

[4] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 2.

[5] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 3.1.

[6] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 3.2.

[7] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 3.3.

[8] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 3.

[9] Ibid at Recommendation 4B 3.3.

Source: http://www.slaw.ca/2013/05/30/thursday-thinkpiece-arthurs-on-legal-fundamentalism/

josh powell madonna halftime show linsanity the alamo anencephaly tesla model x lou gehrig